The Wraith of the Borg

Response to reactions to Systems That Work.

I wrote a simple article called
Systems That Work

about sticking with a system that works.
Didn’t sound particularly revolutionary to me,
however, poster after poster spewed invective, one
claiming that I, (and those like me) held back the
progress of the human race because we refused to upgrade.

Now al qaeda is not the only organization made up of
fanatics. There is a huge population of semi-literate
Information Technology guys whose brains have been so
assimilated that saying “Linux” sends them into paroxysms
of invective coupled with a need to smash computers with
rolly chairs.

This “programming”, (talking about the “brain” of these
‘IT Experts’) is on par with Animal Farm’s Sheep; “XP good,
Vista better”, (and do you know how many years it took to
teach them to stop saying “98 good, XP better?”)

One would have thought a child could differentiate between
Soft ware and Hard ware, but alas, such line has blurred.

Further, it seems a religious tenet that one should strive to
have every single bell and whistle, despite the fact that all
one is doing is producing the same document that was produced
twenty years ago because that document, in that very form is
what the Law requires.

Hence a 286 (any of you IT guys know what I’m talking about?)
connected to a dot matrix printer or the latest over priced
pre bloated VISTA puppy with a full color laser printer, are
required to output the exact same document which looks the
exact same way it looked in 1962.

The use of a computer in an office is to produce the work
faster than a typewriter, which was invented to produce
the work faster than ink and pen.

This article, for example is being typed in Professional
Write, which was developed in 1986. It’s “speed” depends
on how fast I type. That depends on how fast I formulate
ideas. It doesn’t matter if I am typing on a state of the
art just off the production line with every bell and
whistle or a 286, it can’t go any faster, it can’t do more.

As the world went from Windows 3.1 to 95, to 98, to 2000,
to XP and now to VISTA, I stay pat. Why? Because all I need
is a blank screen where, when I’m ready, I can set margins,
spell check, find and replace; and not before.

All I need is a blank page to capture my prose. I don’t
need an automatic “spell check”, because often I’ll have
to use personal names or nicks, and don’t need a machine
telling me that Worf is spelled wrong.

In ancient days, “Command Line”, put all the power in the
hands of the user. The competence of users dropped when 3.1
was introduced, and has continued every single “upgrade” so
that the user is required to know nothing, to do nothing, and
allow the computer to spoon feed them.

There are few time wasters on par turning on a computer,
which is neither connected to the Internet nor receives
foreign media, doing malware checks and bringing up all
sorts of unneeded options, when all that is required is
to type a letter.

It is remarkable that in some offices to simply get a receipt
which wouldn’t take thirty seconds if done by hand, now
eats ten minutes because it is done by computer.

The tragedy is that the Borg have arrived, and have
assimilated most of the human race.

3 Responses

Will Smith
07.10.16

Most ‘Information Technology Experts’ are Microsoft zombies
who know absolutely nothing about anything save the very narrow
band that comes with the ‘help’ key.

Their response to error is to shut off and try again, reload
the same O.S. or app. and have no ability to appreciate that
the reason why the scanner doesn’t work is because there is
no scanner.

WhatUp
07.10.16

My feeling is that if thats all you need, then thats all you need. It doesn’t dictate the needs of all mankind, nor do I feel that was the entire intention of your first article. Not all companies need complex file sharing, backup schemes, or all that other jazz. However, the complexity of a companies computer infrastructure will ultimately dictate its scalability and reliability. The truth is You cant run a Fortune 500 company on DOS and Professional Write. More companies are spread out across the globe, and their networks rely on features only available in newer operating systems. Trust me, if they could, they would run on the cheapest systems they could. Thats my 2 cents. Good article though, I was really surprised at how emotional everyone got over such a topic. lol

A. Fool
07.10.16

The Beauty of Professional Write is its natural encryption.
You can’t open a PW file save if it is saved as ASCII.
When you need confidentiality you can fill a computer
with data, and anyone who hacks in can’t read it.

Neither Windows nor Linux can read Normal PW files.

As you must realise, running a lawyer’s office is one
of the main places you need to protect your data.

What you want to push out to the public can be written
in Word or Open Office, or in PW saved with a .rtf .txt
extension in ASCII. What you want to keep secret, is
secret.

What makes it even better is that so few people have
PW or know it exists one has an extra layer of protection

Leave Your Response