Computersight -

There are a number of very closely related standards that have been developed to describe the practical implementations of optical networking. A number of very different standards and implementations also exist. I will discuss the major players here.

The Advantages of Fiber Optical Networking

First of all, we must note that the biggest advantage of using fiber optic networking and hence the use of fiber optic cable as a transmission medium is the high degree of immunity to noise, cross-talk and Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) that this medium provides.

Spanning Large Distances – With the fiber optic technologies currently available today signal degradation and regeneration issues are not what they once were and so the distance factor that so limits copper-based media is of negligible consequence where fiber optic transmission is concerned.

Environmental Damage – Environment factors such as moisture and Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) are also not of the same criticality as they are for copper-based media. The reasons for fiber optic cable as a transmission medium providing a high degree of immunization to noise (EMI) as opposed to other transmission media all stem from the use of light to convey the information (signals) and the construction of the medium (the fiber optic cable).

Security - Due to the degree of difficulty in “tapping” fiber optic transmission lines without being detected, fiber optic transmission media offer a more secure medium than copper-based or wireless technologies.

The result is that fiber optic transmission media are the media of choice when it comes to “long haul” applications such as intercontinental, cross-continental and oceanic (marine) backbone links. It is also the preferred medium for tier one ISP backbone links. This means that new WAN implementations and applications are now predominantly fiber optic cable based. Wireless rollouts being the major exception.

Additional information regarding fiber optic cable construction, signal propagation, signal regeneration, connectors, cable rollout and modes (single-mode and multi-mode fibers) can be found at Fiber Optic Cable.

I will now discuss the major standards and implementations of fiber optic networking starting with the Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) standard and then the Synchronous Optical Networking (SONET) and the Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH).

Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI)

FDDI which evolved from the IEEE 802.4 token bus timed token protocol is a fault tolerant 100Mbit/sec token passing counter-rotating dual ring LAN standard that permits data transmission between two end-point devices that can be many tens of kilometers apart.

As its name indicates, fiber optic cable is the main form of physical transmission medium used in FDDI. Although a copper-based implementation called, Copper Distributed Data Interface (CDDI) does exist. Although conceived as a LAN standard FDDI has also been used for MAN and WAN implementations.

FDDI Topology – In essence FDDI is a ring network similar to IBM’s Token Ring network but with a number of critical differences. The most noticeable of which is that a FDDI uses a dual-attached, counter-rotating token ring topology (see Figure 1: FDDI).

Fault Tolerance – One ring acts as the primary transmission ring and in the original implementations was capable of delivering transmission speeds of up to 100Mbit/sec. The other or secondary ring was originally intended solely to act as a backup.

This meant that the secondary ring was inactive and remained so for as long as the primary ring was functional. In the event of failure of the primary ring the secondary ring would become active. Now all traffic goes to the secondary ring for transmission. It is this built-in redundancy that makes FDDI is a fault tolerant technology.

Higher Effective Sustained Data Throughput – Another factor in FDDI’s favor was that it used a much larger frame size than Ethernet which meant that it was capable of much higher effective sustained throughput rates than standard 100Mbit/sec Ethernet. Administrators also had the option of using the secondary ring for data transport rather than having it stand idly by thereby doubling transmission capacity to 200Mbit/sec.

Coverage and Scalability – Not only can FDDI traverse large distances it also scales much better than 100Mbit/sec Ethernet. This means it provides superior support for expanding enterprise networks consisting of hundreds or thousands of users.

Fiber Distributed Data Interface II (FDDI-II) – FDDI-II is a more recent development of FDDI that has added support for circuit-switched services thereby enabling FDDI to carry both voice and video signals as well. For more on FDDI including applicable standards please see About Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI).

Synchronous Optical Networking – SONET

Synchronous Optical Networking (SONET) is an established high-speed WAN alternative for communicating digital information using lasers or Light-Emitting Diodes (LEDs) over optical cable offered by several telecommunications companies.

SONET was originally developed to replace the Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH) system for transporting large amounts of telephone and data traffic as well as providing the mechanisms that allow for interoperability between equipment from different vendors. The result is that there are multiple, very closely related standards that describe synchronous optical networking including:

Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) – The SDH standard was developed by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and is documented in standard G.707 and its extension G.708. SDH is used throughout the world but not in North America

Synchronous Optical Networking (SONET) – The SONET standard as defined by GR-253-CORE from Telcordia™. Primarily used exclusively in Canada and the USA where SDH has not been implemented, although it can be found in other countries.

Synchronization is Key – Through the use of atomic clocks synchronous networking data transport rates are very tightly regulated which allows for entire inter-country networks to operate synchronously while greatly reducing the amount of buffering required between elements in the network. This reduction in overhead (buffering) translates into greater effective net data throughput rates.

Encapsulation – Both SONET and SDH can be used to encapsulate earlier digital transmission standards, such as the PDH standard, or used directly to support either ATM or so-called Packet over SONET/SDH (POS) networking.

Generic Transport Containers – SDH and SONET are generic all-purpose transport containers for moving voice and data rather than just communications protocols per sec.

SDH and SONET Frame Structures

Standard packet or frame oriented data transmission frames usually consist of a header and a payload with the header of the frame being transmitted first, followed by the payload and a trailer (e.g. CRC). With synchronous optical networking both the header, which is referred to as the overhead and the payload still exist but the big difference is that the overhead is not all transmitted before the payload, rather the transmission is interleaved.

Interleaved Transmission – With interleaved transmissions the transmission of the conversation goes like this:

First of all, a portion of the overhead (header) is transmitted. This is followed by part of the payload. After which the next part of the overhead is transmitted. This is followed by the next part of the payload and so on until the entire frame has been transmitted. Figure 2: Interleaving above shows this.

SONET Frame Size and Transmission Sequence – SONET frames are 810 octets in size, transmitted as 3 octets of overhead, followed by 87 octets of payload, nine times over until 810 octets have been transmitted. The total frame transmission time is 125 microseconds.

SDH Frame Size and Transmission Sequence – SDH frames are 2430 octets in size transmitted as 9 octets of overhead, followed by 261 octets of payload, also nine times over until 2430 octets have been transmitted. Again the total frame transmission time is also 125 microseconds.

It doesn’t take much brain power to see that SDH is capable of an effective data throughput rate three times that which the North American implementation of SONET can achieve.

Ethernet over Fiber Optic Cable

Today we see the Gigabit Ethernet over fiber optic cable and 10G Ethernet over fiber optic cable standards being the most common implementations of optical local area networks (LANs) currently being rolled out. They are also used extensively as the network core layer’s transport medium of choice particularly Ethernet networks.

The majority of the big players in the networking hardware arena like Cisco, Juniper, and Redback etc all produce numerous products with fiber optic support including Ethernet over Fiber Optic modules. Note see Network Design: Hierarchiesfor more about network design and the functions and features of a network’s core layer.